Politico is out with a new article looking at early voting in four key battleground states that will likely determine who will run the U.S Senate come January.
First they look at Colorado.
For the first time, all state voters will cast their ballot by mail. That makes early voting in the Centennial State just, well, voting.
As of Friday, Republicans undeniably have the advantage: 41 percent of early voters were registered Republicans, while 32 percent were registered Democrats, according to data from Colorado’s Secretary of State. But few operatives expect the margin to remain that wide.
But Democrats attribute that advantage to geography and age. Older and rural voters are more likely to vote Republican — and more likely to mail their ballots early because it’s less convenient to physically turn in ballots on Election Day. Younger and urban voters are more likely to wait to turn in their ballots in person.
Udall’s team say they remain optimistic, arguing unaffiliated voters — which the state’s data shows comprises 25 percent of early voters so far — will break for Democrats. Democrats also point to Republicans’ early lead in early voting 2010 and 2012, gaps that Democrats ultimately closed in statewide races on Election Day.
“It’s a question of whether we can catch them this year fast enough,” said Colorado Democratic consultant Laura Chapin.
Most of all, the new system, in which every single registered voter was mailed a ballot, makes turnout unpredictable. Voters can also register to vote on Election Day.
Georgia does not have party registration, so political observers are analyzing Georgia early voting based on demographics. So far, results have been mixed.
Democrats are pleased with the high number of African American voters turning out early — 30.4 percent of the ballots returned so far, according to the United States Election Project, which aggregates early voting data from every state. That’s a big deal for Democrats, according to pollster Fred Hicks, who said, “If the African-American turnout is 30 percent or higher, you can actually see Democrats win on the fourth.”
But Hicks conducted an exit poll of early voters and found the majority of African Americans casting early ballots were already likely voters — meaning they were always expected to vote, they just opted to do so early. That’s a problem for Democrats, who put a lot of effort into turning out African-Americans in this midterm.
As of Thursday, Democrats held a narrow lead over Republicans in early voting: 40.9 percent to 39.2 percent, also according to the United States Election Project.
Iowa Republicans are encouraged by those results because historically, Democrats lead early voting by a much wider margin. Republicans credit their success to a concerted effort to prioritize early voting, arguing GOP voters are more motivated to turn out for Ernst than Democrats are for Bruce Braley.
The big question in North Carolina is how unaffiliated voters will break when the results are tallied. So far, unaffiliated voters are sending in ballots at a much higher rate than in 2010.
Of course, both campaigns say their projections predict those voters will break for them — but that’s impossible to determine before Election Day.
Registered Democrats are also voting early in higher numbers than they did in the last midterm — a good sign for Democrats.
So in quick recap, Democrats are right now winning in Iowa despite polls showing Ernst with a huge lead a few weeks ago. Now the race is almost a dead heat. If Democrats show up on Election Day and Ernst is tied or down one percent to Bruce the small early voting edge could be what turns Iowa blue. Democrats are behind in Colorado but Udall is closing the gap the polls suggest. Georgia and North Carolina both have seen an upswing of black voters.
Categories: Senate Election News